Careful who you buy from

If the environment is destroyed, fish disappear from rivers and oceans, the human race becomes extinct it will be in large measure down to big corporations. Everyone knows the years of denials from the tobacco industry about the health risks of smoking long after these were established beyond any doubt. This last summer has with great force brought home the consequence of climate breakdown, yet the big oil companies continue to lie and distort the undeniable truth of this. And not forgetting the vile privatised water companies which have polluted our rivers in a relentless hunger for high profits. The same plutocrats attempt to brainwash the public through the newspapers and social media platforms they own. Bezos, owner of Amazon, the Acme Corporation from the Roadrunner cartoons made real, owns the Washington Post and has stopped the paper reporting on climate change. More fools those who swallow their propaganda.

What is the corporate influence in fishing tackle manufacture? We think back to when tackle makers were a cottage industry, small workshops that built split cane rods, machined reels, turned floats, but these have largely gone or been subsumed into larger businesses. Traditional names like Hardy, Shakespeare and Abu are now subsidiaries of Pure Fishing, an American company. But this in turn is owned by Sycamore Partners, an American private equity firm. Private equity pools money from institutions and the wealthy to buy up companies. The modus operandi involves borrowing heavily and loading companies with debt coupled with asset stripping and aggressive cost cuts, all to generate short-term profits. Companies caught in their net often go to the wall and Sycamore Partners is no different . US senator, Bernie Saunders, recently urged the group to reverse its decision to strip workers of paid holiday.

Other corporate conglomerates in the fishing world are public Rapala VMC (Rapala, Storm and others) private equity groups Rather Outdoors (Browning, Preston Innovations, Fox, . . .) and Simms. Daiwa and Shimano are both public (owned by shareholders) Japanese conglomerates. So many of the famous names are part of big business. The question is whether we should buy stuff from them. I am disinclined to get anything from the Pure Fishing stable due to its ownership though I think the major Japanese companies are ethical. Are there any of the small-scale fishing tackle firms left? Yes there are. Guideline is a family owned company in Finland. Coarse fishing companies include Nash and Gardner, although some, Fox for example, have also been gobbled up by the private equity vulture. Drennan International, which began in a garage and is still managed by Peter Drennan, remains a private company though has now outsourced manufacturing across several ‘economically competitive’ (i.e. cheap labour) countries. Fulling Mill, now bought out by an ex Tory MP and placed within a holding company, apparently formed specifically for that purpose, continues to sell flies tied in Kenya, the fly-tying capital of the world. Then there are ethical Patagonia, environmental stalwart Orvis and more. So alternatives to big corporations are out there.

I imagine many anglers don’t worry too much about the origin of the kit they buy. But we should, as with all our purchases. Our future depends on it. If I buy another fly rod, I’ll be looking more at Guideline than Hardy. Consumers do have power.

Follow @secretangler

Project White Elephant

The Sportfish Spring Spectacular referred to in the last post finds room for a small number of videos about the environment among the tuition and tackle tartery. Not that watchers show that much interest in them: last time I looked, views for the latest gear videos outnumbered those for river quality 8 to 1. Custard pies of the environment.

I have to admit, though, that the various projects meant to undo decades of pollution in our watercourses are slow moving at best, or utterly pointless at worst, as regular readers of this blog will know. The latest is Project White Hart, a new scheme for saving the vanishing salmon population of the southern chalk streams. The founder is an actor called Jim Murray — no, I’ve never heard of him either — and the title White Hart invokes the mythological connotation of the white stag which dates back to medieval times.

Perhaps the name is not the best considering that we don’t want southern salmon to turn into a myth, although that is looking probable. The project blurb informs us that salmon numbers in the Test and Itchen are only 20% of the conservation limit, the figure below which a population cannot sustain itself. In other words, the Test & Itchen salmon is functionally extinct already — beyond the point of no return. If we could throw a switch to reverse overnight all the depredations to the catchment, it wouldn’t help. Bleak news.

Maybe populations of the neighbouring Hampshire Avon can still be saved. How, then, is the Project going to bring this about? This is where one gets the familiar sinking feeling. The Plan of (in)Action’s first step is to ‘bring stakeholders, communities . . .to the table’. Second, ‘Conduct a full “catchment audit” for the Test and Itchen watersheds . . .’ The third step, to summarise, is make everything better. You have to wonder what has been going on so far, given that the decline of salmon has been going on for years. Are all the stakeholders wandering around Hampshire gazing at the clouds? If the catchment needs ‘a complete ecological health check’, what has happened to all the surveys of the two rivers, carried out by the Environment Agency and citizen scientists, who appear to outnumber the salmon. Or is all the data collection, as I suspect, revealing nothing very useful about the state of the water or the answer to salmon declines?

Just suppose the salmon population is still saveable. How long have we got? Certainly not long enough to be arsing around bringing all and sundry to the table, picking at fingernails and writing waffle for the AST website and Sportfish videos. The three-point action plan could be reduced to one: Do an awful lot of nothing and tell everyone about it.

If you want a real action plan, consider this:

  1. Meter all water supplies throughout the south of the country (make it the whole country) and legislate for other water conservation measures.
  2. Clamp down on the egregious actions of the water companies and prosecute the guilty mismanagers.
  3. Fund rapid improvement in agricultural practice.
  4. Instigate the policing of commercial fishing in appropriate Atlantic areas to check for salmon bycatch and illegal fishing.

I don’t expect any of this to happen in time.

Follow @secretangler

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started