Fishwatching amidst the bedlam

Another spring bank holiday, this time with amber heat warnings and a threat of record temperatures at levels once rarely seen in this country even in August. The kind of weather in which you want to sit quietly beneath the shade of a tree. Instead most people, especially the petrolheads, prefer to burn fuel on the roads, sports cars and convoys of helmets creating a deafening roar, and not only on the main routes. I’ve written before how the narrow byways of the Lake District and Yorkshire Dales are turned into homages to the internal combustion engine and illegal exhausts. Riverbanks are no sanctuary either. Blokes in shapeless shorts and printed T-shirts waddle along with little dogs, the aptly name shih tszus (correct spelling shitsu) and cockerpoounderyourshoes, yappy untrained pooches that jump up at you when not pissing on the pavements or crapping on the wild verges.

Where can the angler yearning for the peace of the waterside go? Not to the beach. The waters of the English Channel are usually too clear for daytime fishing. Besides, they are crowded with those who do love to be beside the seaside and give beach casters little room to swing a five-ounce lead. Then there are the floating versions of motorbikes, the jetskis ridden by tattooed lobsters with shaven heads, ignoring the local beach bylaws and boosting the skin cancer figures.

The coarse angler can seek out the deep gravel pits where the tench can seek out the cool depths. With a bit of luck there will be a tree to fish under. But even then you may not get a bite till evening brings some relief from the heat.

The fly fisherman has few options. There are the big reservoirs if you like that sort of thing but rivers are hot work and the trout don’t like warming water. At this rate the southern streams will be too warm to fish before we get to summer proper. Too many reaches now attract bathers and paddleboarders, rock-throwers and flea-treated dog washers, whether they’re allowed or not. No place for the delicate art of the dry fly.

Instead of fishing I went to watch fish from the footbridge over my local river. I spotted a pair of trout holding in the current, moving to the side every so often, sometimes coming to the surface. I can happily watch fish for ages. In this weather it seems the right thing to do to leave them alone. We all need a bit of peace.

Follow @secretangler

Project White Elephant

The Sportfish Spring Spectacular referred to in the last post finds room for a small number of videos about the environment among the tuition and tackle tartery. Not that watchers show that much interest in them: last time I looked, views for the latest gear videos outnumbered those for river quality 8 to 1. Custard pies of the environment.

I have to admit, though, that the various projects meant to undo decades of pollution in our watercourses are slow moving at best, or utterly pointless at worst, as regular readers of this blog will know. The latest is Project White Hart, a new scheme for saving the vanishing salmon population of the southern chalk streams. The founder is an actor called Jim Murray — no, I’ve never heard of him either — and the title White Hart invokes the mythological connotation of the white stag which dates back to medieval times.

Perhaps the name is not the best considering that we don’t want southern salmon to turn into a myth, although that is looking probable. The project blurb informs us that salmon numbers in the Test and Itchen are only 20% of the conservation limit, the figure below which a population cannot sustain itself. In other words, the Test & Itchen salmon is functionally extinct already — beyond the point of no return. If we could throw a switch to reverse overnight all the depredations to the catchment, it wouldn’t help. Bleak news.

Maybe populations of the neighbouring Hampshire Avon can still be saved. How, then, is the Project going to bring this about? This is where one gets the familiar sinking feeling. The Plan of (in)Action’s first step is to ‘bring stakeholders, communities . . .to the table’. Second, ‘Conduct a full “catchment audit” for the Test and Itchen watersheds . . .’ The third step, to summarise, is make everything better. You have to wonder what has been going on so far, given that the decline of salmon has been going on for years. Are all the stakeholders wandering around Hampshire gazing at the clouds? If the catchment needs ‘a complete ecological health check’, what has happened to all the surveys of the two rivers, carried out by the Environment Agency and citizen scientists, who appear to outnumber the salmon. Or is all the data collection, as I suspect, revealing nothing very useful about the state of the water or the answer to salmon declines?

Just suppose the salmon population is still saveable. How long have we got? Certainly not long enough to be arsing around bringing all and sundry to the table, picking at fingernails and writing waffle for the AST website and Sportfish videos. The three-point action plan could be reduced to one: Do an awful lot of nothing and tell everyone about it.

If you want a real action plan, consider this:

  1. Meter all water supplies throughout the south of the country (make it the whole country) and legislate for other water conservation measures.
  2. Clamp down on the egregious actions of the water companies and prosecute the guilty mismanagers.
  3. Fund rapid improvement in agricultural practice.
  4. Instigate the policing of commercial fishing in appropriate Atlantic areas to check for salmon bycatch and illegal fishing.

I don’t expect any of this to happen in time.

Follow @secretangler

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started