The North-South divide

It seems to be an article of faith that the north of England has several advantages over the South. Some are true, others are myths. The biggest myth is the reputation for the friendliness of Northerners. I read recently a newspaper article by a young female comedian from the North who couldn’t understand why people believed this. Her experience is that her fellow Northerners, the men in particular, are mickey-taking bullies. Obviously not everyone is like that; I find that people are less reserved, such that the nice ones are warm and friendly but the unpleasant ones are distinctly hostile. This probably has something to do with the infamous Yorkshireman stereotype: ‘Ah speak mah mind, me,’ which, translated, means he airs his prejudices and cares not whom he offends. Applies to some women too.

Another conviction the South-country fly fishermen might hold is the assumed superiority of the trout fishing and fly hatches in the North. At one time they were better but years of agricultural pollution, and now regular sewage discharges, have changed all that. One curiosity are the data readings on pollution taken by citizen scientists. These suggest that water quality on southern rivers is lower than the northern, yet fish stocks are healthier, at least in the better chalk rivers, and not just because there is more stocking down south. Grayling, for example, are numerous in rivers like the Test and Avon, but more thinly spread in the rivers of the northwest particularly. I think perhaps fly hatches are a little better in the spate rivers but nothing like the old books lead you to expect. The old-timers who’ve fished these rivers all their lives will tell you how much poorer they are now, with a steeper decline in fish populations during the last two decades. As with the salmon, so with trout and grayling, though not so acute and for different reasons.

Southerners will all know about the traffic problems we have to live with. The North has the appeal of lower population density and less traffic on the roads, especially the motorways. Once past the major conurbations of Leeds and Manchester, cars on the road are noticeably fewer. But in summer tourism adds to this, especially the two-wheeled tourers I’ve mentioned before. Motorbikes ruin the peace of so much of the beautiful landscape of the Yorkshire Dales, Westmorland and the Lake District. This is not just a northern problem: the Southwest and Snowdonia are also damaged by these ageing beardies on their infernal machines, more polluting than cars. Visit somewhere like Settle in Yorkshire and all you will hear in the warmer months is the banging of engines echoing off the ancient stonework with the acrid stink of exhaust permanently in the air. Like noisy kids playing follow-my-leader, hitting tin drums, they trail around the narrow hilly roads of the area making a din audible from riverbanks and hilltops. Along with all that goes the usual litter along main roads — the commercial drivers — and even sandwich packets, paper cups and all the rest on minor roads, no matter how lovely the surrounding scenery. For the perpetrators environmental degradation is not a concern.

So sadly a fishing trip north no longer affords good fly fishing in peaceful settings. There are stretches that still have reasonable numbers of fish, notably the stocked waters, but overall you’ll find better fishing down south, although possibly more expensive. Some of the Yorkshire towns are delightful though you’ll still get the 4 by 4s blocking pavements with engines running while the occupants fiddle with their phones or guzzle a cake. That’s another myth: Northerners are no more hardy than anyone else; perish the thought they should sit in a cold car.

Still, the fishing is a change of sorts from the South, and you might even get one of those big wild trout that survive yet. But overall I’m glad I’m a Southerner.

Follow @secretangler

The AST’s Head of Waffle

Just over ten years ago, David Graeber, an anthropologist, wrote an article about ‘bullshit jobs’, which he defines as those which are engaged in unproductive work — clerical, administrative, advertising and the like. My favourite candidate for a bullshit job is PR or, as it’s more often called these days, communication. Just about every organisation seems to have someone in a job of this kind, including those to do with fishing, the Atlantic Salmon Trust for example, whose Head of Communications is Jonathon Muir. This is part of how he describes his job

Key to restoring the species [salmon] at scale and pace is by delivering landscape-scale solutions to land managers and policymakers, in addition to harnessing nature-positive finance and philanthropic funding within the corporate sector, using wild salmon as a keystone focus species within efforts to tackle the wider twin crisis of climate change and biodiversity loss.

Heads of communication clearly have a different way of communicating than the rest of us. ‘Landscape-scale solutions’? ‘Nature-positive finance’? Muir must spend much of his time weaving meaningless phrases from a dictionary of corporate gobbledygook. But he’s also written a piece for the Soapbox section in the September issue of Trout & Salmon, a rather Pollyannaish plea for ‘positivity’. Of course the words positive and negative are much bandied about these days, especially by lovers of obtuse language: negative is frequently used to describe someone who holds a different point of view, positive for those who have the same. According to Muir ‘We owe it to future generations of wild salmon lovers . . . to be relentlessly positive . . .’. When you consider that the Atlantic salmon population has crashed in most rivers either side of the Ocean, never mind the rapid disappearance of numerous other animal and plant species worldwide, the sixth mass extinction, it is hard to know what he means. Certainly lapsing into despair will not get us out of the environmental mess of our own making, but frittering away time on fruitless projects, as I believe the Atlantic Salmon Trust is doing, is not cause for optimism. Jonathon Muir seems to personify that foot-dragging.

To give him his due, he does refer to illegal exploitation in the T&S article, which is the first mention I’ve seen from anyone in the AST. The trouble is he is part of the ‘slow pace of action’ and telling us all to cheer up will do nothing to help. Indeed it may even give anglers an excuse to carry on with their own polluting ways — driving high-emission 4 by 4s (does JM own one?), flying around the world for fishing jollies, as encouraged by the magazines Trout & Salmon and Fly Culture among others. Anglers have a nasty habit of laying the blame anywhere but their own doorstep.

In the interests of giving the AST impetus, perhaps I can help Jonny redraft his job description, and that of all the AST employees:

Find out what’s killing the salmon. Take action to prevent it. And be quick about it.

Follow @secretangler

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started